{"id":31412,"date":"2018-05-18T11:56:33","date_gmt":"2018-05-18T11:56:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/punjabnews24.com\/?p=31412"},"modified":"2018-05-18T11:56:33","modified_gmt":"2018-05-18T11:56:33","slug":"cricket-in-olympics-will-mean-more-revenue-for-the-icc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/cricket-in-olympics-will-mean-more-revenue-for-the-icc\/","title":{"rendered":"Cricket in Olympics will mean more revenue for the ICC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>According to a BCCI representative present at the meeting, the ICC feels that cricket\u2019s entry to the Olympics would open up a relatively closed economy, as it creates the possibility of wooing countries like China.Taking cricket to the Olympics has had been one of the foremost issues on the ICC agenda, and the global body\u2019s Strategic Working Group (SWG) expectedly focused on the globalisation of the game, as they discussed global strategy for cricket with the BCCI in Delhi on Thursday. The 72-point SWOT analysis\u201418 each of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats\u2014done by the SWG mentioned cricket\u2019s over-reliance on India\u2019s money and the Indian fans. The ICC representatives, it is learnt, spoke about the need to tap a wider market for alternate revenue sources.<br \/>\nAccording to a BCCI representative present at the meeting, the ICC feels that cricket\u2019s entry to the Olympics would open up a relatively closed economy, as it creates the possibility of wooing countries like China. The Chinese getting into cricket would give the game a serious boost, money and market wise. Also, government funding for an Olympic sport would help a lot of cricket boards gasping for survival.<br \/>\nWhile the BCCI officials agreed to the extent that alternative revenue sources would help cricket prosper, they stressed the fact that the Indian money can\u2019t be seen as a weakness. The Indian board so far has objected to cricket\u2019s participation in the Olympics and it still remains non-committal on the subject. \u201cAll these need to come to the general body. The members will decide,\u201d a BCCI official said.<br \/>\nThe Committee of Administrators (CoA) head Vinod Rai, however, offered a different perspective. \u201cThe BCCI has played cricket in the Commonwealth Games (the 1998 Kuala Lumpur Games). So the BCCI is not averse to participating in multi-sport events. Why they stopped, we don\u2019t know,\u201d Rai told The Indian Express. The Indian board fears that cricket in the Olympics (in T20 format) might devalue the ICC World T20, both in terms of popularity and revenue. And the ICC members in turn would be affected. Rai begged to differ. \u201cIf cricket gets into the Olympics, the ICC would create a cycle (for the World T20) such that the two don\u2019t clash.\u201d At the conclusion of the ICC conclave in Kolkata last month, chief executive David Richardson exuded confidence that cricket could be part of the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. Rai, though, left the matter to the BCCI general body to decide India\u2019s stand. Issues like the Olympics participation, the proposed conversion of the 2021 Champions Trophy to a World T20, the BCCI\u2019s reduced revenue share have irked a vast section of the Indian board. In fact, the BCCI members haven\u2019t taken kindly to the ICC\u2019s expansion policy. Eighteen member units had a teleconference yesterday and took a \u201cdim view\u201d of some recent developments in the world body. There\u2019s a feeling within the BCCI that the ICC\u2019s \u2018greater good\u2019 of the game theory is basically aimed at weakening India\u2019s global position as the game\u2019s only superpower.<br \/>\nRai allayed the fears. \u201cThe Strategic Group of the ICC, the first presentation they have made, which is to the CoA. They haven\u2019t taken it to the (ICC) Board as yet. They said they would first discuss with the BCCI and only then they would discuss it with any other country,\u201d Rai told this paper, adding: \u201cIt was clarified today that the way \u2018weakness\u2019 is written implies that they (ICC) only want to develop other countries, with greater amount of revenue generation. An item in the SWOT analysis has said the revenue at present is coming from the BCCI. And they are saying that other nations should also be encouraged to raise more revenue. Nothing wrong in it.\u201d But the BCCI functionaries appear to be far from convinced. Questions have been raised over the veracity of the SWOT analysis. A note prepared by a board official ahead of the today\u2019s meeting had said: \u201cWhere is the data to support all of this and the source of the data?\u201d It added: \u201cWhy did ICC feel the need to hire an external consultant to assist in development of the Global Strategy for Cricket? Was he paid 250K USD for this?\u201d<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>According to a BCCI representative present at the meeting, the ICC feels that cricket\u2019s entry to the Olympics would open up a relatively closed economy, as it creates the possibility of wooing countries like China.Taking cricket to the Olympics has had been one of the foremost issues on the ICC agenda, and the global body\u2019s [&hellip;]<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":31413,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[122],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31412","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sports"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31412","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31412"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31412\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31414,"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31412\/revisions\/31414"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31413"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31412"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31412"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31412"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}