{"id":41023,"date":"2018-09-03T11:01:12","date_gmt":"2018-09-03T11:01:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/?p=41023"},"modified":"2018-09-03T11:01:12","modified_gmt":"2018-09-03T11:01:12","slug":"sc-slams-income-tax-dept-says-apex-court-is-not-a-picnic-place","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/sc-slams-income-tax-dept-says-apex-court-is-not-a-picnic-place\/","title":{"rendered":"SC slams income tax dept, says apex court is not a &#8216;picnic place&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>New Delhi<br \/>\nThe Supreme Court has slammed the Income Tax department for making &#8220;misleading statement&#8221; about pendency of an appeal while making it clear that the apex court is not a &#8220;picnic place&#8221; and cannot be treated like this.<\/p>\n<p>A bench headed by Justice Madan B Lokur slapped a cost of Rs 10 lakh on the department and said it was &#8220;shocked&#8221; that the Centre, through the Commissioner of Income Tax, has taken the matter &#8220;so casually&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The bench, also comprising Justices S Abdul Nazeer and Deepak Gupta, also noted in its order that the plea was filed by the IT department after a delay of 596 days and &#8220;inadequate and unconvincing explanation&#8221; was given for the delay.<br \/>\n&#8220;Please do not do this. The Supreme Court is not a picnic place. Is this the way you treat the Supreme Court of India?,&#8221; the bench told the counsel appearing for the department.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;You cannot treat the Supreme Court like this,&#8221; the bench said.<\/p>\n<p>The top court observed that in the petition filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Ghaziabad, the department has said that a similar matter filed in 2012 was pending in the court.<\/p>\n<p>It, however, noted that the matter referred to as pending by the department was decided by the apex court way back in September 2012.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In other words, the petitioners have given a totally misleading statement before this court. We are shocked that the Union of India through the Commissioner of Income Tax has taken the matter so casually,&#8221; the bench said in its order while dismissing the petition.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;As we have noted, there is an inadequate explanation of delay of 596 days in filing the petition and a misleading statement about pendency of a similar civil appeal,&#8221; it said.<\/p>\n<p>It said the cost of Rs 10 lakh be deposited with the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee within four weeks and the amount be utilised for juvenile justice issues.<\/p>\n<p>The department had moved the apex court challenging the August 29, 2016 judgement of the Allahabad High Court which had dismissed their appeal against an Income Tax Appellate Tribunal order.<\/p>\n<p>The plea before the high court pertained to different assessment years concerning the Hapur Pilkhuwa Development Authority , a body constituted under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>New Delhi The Supreme Court has slammed the Income Tax department for making &#8220;misleading statement&#8221; about pendency of an appeal while making it clear that the apex court is not a &#8220;picnic place&#8221; and cannot be treated like this. A bench headed by Justice Madan B Lokur slapped a cost of Rs 10 lakh on [&hellip;]<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":41025,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[312,315],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41023","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-india","category-top-stories"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41023","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41023"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41023\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41026,"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41023\/revisions\/41026"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/41025"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41023"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41023"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blastingskyhawk.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41023"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}