Supreme Court is all set to get four new judges as its Collegium headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi is reliably learnt to have cleared the elevation of chief justices of high courts of Punjab and Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan and Kerala.

The CJI-led Collegium which includes Justice SA Bobde, Justice NV Ramana, Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Rohinton F Nariman approved the four names in a meeting held on Wednesday, sources privy to the development said.

Those proposed to be elevated to the Supreme Court are Punjab and Haryana High Court Chief Justice Krishna Murari, Himachal Pradesh High Court Chief Justice V Ramasubramanian, Rajasthan High Court Chief Justice S Ravindra Bhat and Kerala High Court Chief Justice Hrishikesh Roy, they said, adding, a formal announcement was expected soon.

Justice Murari and Justice Ramasubramanian had taken over as CJ of Punjab and Haryana HC and Himachal Pradesh HC, respectively, in June while Justice Bhat has been functioning as Rajasthan CJ since May this year. Justice Roy has been the CJ of Kerala HC for a year.

CJI Ranjan Gogoi had in June this year written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi seeking to increase the strength of judges in view of increasing pendency of cases in the top court due to filing of more fresh cases.

The CJI had also written about increasing the retirement age of high court judges from 62 years to 65 years but the government hasn’t acted upon this suggestion.

After these appointments are notified and the four judges take oath, the number of judges in the Supreme Court will for the first time reach 34, including the CJI.

The Collegium recommendation follows passage of “The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2019″ by Parliament earlier this month to increase the number of Supreme Court judges from 30 to 33, excluding the CJI, with a view to reduce pendency of cases which touched 59,696 on July 1, 2019.

The CJI had highlighted that due to paucity of judges, the required number of Constitution Benches to decide important cases involving questions of law were not being set up.